I'm preemptively declaring the worst movie title of 2013: The Haunting in Connecticut 2: The Ghosts of Georgia. Apparently, this is the sequel to the 2002 TV movie, A Haunting in Connecticut (despite the two films having no direct connection). As the title of the "sequel" suggests, it takes place in Georgia, not Connecticut. Yes, it's using the same logic as Reno 911! Miami, but without any awareness of how contradictory the title is.
Showing posts with label stupid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stupid. Show all posts
Friday, December 28, 2012
Stupid Movie Title
Labels:
2013,
a haunting in connecticut,
georgia,
ghosts of georgia,
horror,
movie,
poster,
sequel,
stupid,
the haunting in connecticut,
title,
worst
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Super Stupid Customers at the Super Market
I used to work in a supermarket in the city of Calabasas. And in July 2011, the city not only banned plastic grocery bags, but started requiring the stores to charge ten cents for paper bags (which is how much the bags cost the store). While most people either support this or realize that it’s not a big deal, some people feel that this is a violation of their civil rights, and will gladly say that the fee is fascist, communist, or Orwellian. They will often say it loudly, so that everyone in earshot will know that they are against the fee and that they don’t know what the words fascist, communist, and Orwellian mean.
In case any of these not so blissfully ignorant few are reading this (yet can’t find time to go to dictionary.com), I’ll explain what it would be like if the new law were fascist/communist/Orwellian.
If the law were fascist, there would be no fee. All the paper and plastic bags would be destroyed and production and import of the bags would stop completely. Anyone found using non-reusable bags would be detained/beaten/killed.
If the law were communist, the company that produces the reusable bags would provide them to the community for free where they would be communal property. Since the society itself isn’t communist, that wouldn’t be the case. The most communist it could be would involve everyone’s tax dollars goes to buy a large cache of reusable bags for the members of the community to use as needed.
If the law were Orwellian, the city government would be watching closely to see who is buying the paper bags, who is using reusable bags, and who is just carrying their groceries to the car. They would then use this data to help determine the person’s value in society.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
